Talk:Juno/@comment-34945646-20180821130018/@comment-34945646-20180821164213

The rhetoric/entire ordeal of "They wouldn't do that cause they're a kid friendly game!" is pretty... dumb. No offense. But the LGBT community isn't strictly "nsfw" or "child unfriendly", despise people thinking of so, as Identifying as a certain gender or loving another person that is different from the normal heteronormacy is not harmful to kids. It would also bring more people to their venue too.

Even if it's controversial, we still have the headdress in game, a still highly controversial item even if it's 'removed from stores. So I'm prettyyy sure it's not as much of a big risk compared to having a racist, culturally appropriated item in game that stereotypes first nation people.

Juno, if it's true that theyre nonbinary, it's would be a big step that could be compared to Sapphire and Ruby from Steven Universe, Marceline and Bubblegum [aswell as BMO] from Adventure time and Luna from The Loud House. All kids related media, all having LGBT characters despise that they'd get under controversy for it. [also, Danger and Eggs as a bonus. Amazon prime TV show though.]

So, it's still possible. Even if it's conceived as not "kid friendly" as of right now.

And even if it doesn't happen, it doesn't matter cause again.

I'm suggesting that people crushing other people down for hoping for things that represent something that they are [as you are doing right now] is actually.. really horrible. I don't want to compare it to this but it's quite close. It's on the same lines as the crisis of having only white characters/little to no racial diversity and having little to no female characters aswell, especially with the lead characters. People thought it'd cut down ratings, wouldn't be possible, etc. cause people brought them down on it and people were afraid to make that jump.

Excuse the huge, long thread. But this is important to me. Won't be replying on this thread further cause I really do not care for fighting about this longer than this.