Talk:Masterpiece/@comment-31481788-20180820145317/@comment-34971681-20180820180145

In my personal opinion, no.

Art shouldn't be based around popularity. It should be based around quality. E.g. Aparri's art of a scribble. I have buddies who are willing to trade good long collars if not more for that piece of artwork and I don't see why.

It didn't take any talent and people liked the piece because Aparri is a famous Animal Jam youtuber (no hate to Aparri, his videos are pretty funny in my opinion.)

If an art has a good amount of likes, that's fantastic and it is great that people are taking notice of that person's piece of work but if an art has about 500 - 1000 likes and it is a drawing of a stickman, I don't think it makes it any rarer.

As a matter of fact, I have a piece of artwork made by xxninjaxx333. It doesn't have many likes at all (less than 20, I believe) but the art is amazing (it is a realistic drawing of a dragon.) If amazingly realistic art has barely any likes yet people are willing to trade great items for it then arts with a lot of likes that base around black lines and scribbles shouldn't be classified as the next "big AJ artist" piece that could be worth goodness knows how much.

Again, this is my personal opinion c: People are allowed to disagree/agree without causing flame wars and arguments C: