Talk:Headdress/@comment-31629649-20170614014949

If AJHQ thinks these are offensive, why wouldn't they remove them like they did with skullys and bring them back as diamond items if they aren't offensive to anyone :/ and they aren't culturally insensitive, I have a few Native American friends who find no offense from this item. Even their parents say "I would love that item! It looks so cool!"

I think AJHQ is TRYING to mess up the rarity system, especially for non members, since most rarer items are member-only (spiked collars, party hats, tiki masks, headdresses, etc.), even though there are some exceptions, such as the glitched rings and beta blankets.

I have more evidence of AJHQ trying to mess up the rarity system:

1. Discontinuing a cool-looking item

2. Re-releasing old rare items (such as River Race)

3. Sending glitched "magenta" items to scammed/hacked players (don't know if this is intentional or not, probably not) and letting them keep the one-of-a-kind items.

4. Not establishing enough security (duplicated items are still popping up everywhere, I've seen 5 different people with magenta socks, not including Theshopking)

5. Adding "rare" tags to uncommon items (i.e. 2016 and older carnival items and the rare clover/flower armor sets)

6. Removing old, uncommon items from stores (e.g. coral fence pieces, scented candles, fruit/vegetable baskets)

I wish that there wasn't a rarity system in Animal Jam. I mean, it's part of the fun, but maybe there should be a second version, a "premium" Animal Jam where every item is available in stores. If that did happen, I'm guessing AJHQ would make it cost money (similar to memberships), but I doubt they'd put memberships in AJ Premium.