Category:Adventure_Gameplay_Elements currently includes a number of pages dedicated to specific adventure structures, places, weapons, and other elements.

1) How should we handle pages about specific places that can be found inside of adventures? (Example: Bunny Burrow)

• A - Create separate pages for them

• B - Merge them with the adventure page

• C - Something else (please explain)

2) How should we handle pages about structures in adventures? (Examples: Phantom Webs, Phantom Sprouter)

• A - Leave them as separate pages

• B - Create an "Adventure Structures" page with all adventure structures and remove information about them from existing pages

• C - Something else (please explain)

3) How should we handle pages about explosive weapons that deal damage to destructible objects? (Examples: Whirlpearl, Paintseed, Boomseed)

• A - Leave them as separate pages

• B - Merge them with the "Weapons" page and modify the intro paragraph and article structure as necessary

• C - Create an "Explosive Weapons" page with all explosive weapons and remove existing pages about them

• D - Something else (please explain)

For the discussion thread, see [Discussion] New Categories.

The Vote: Should the wiki add Category:Renamed_Items to article pages about items that were renamed?

• Support means the aforementioned category will be added to the appropriate articles on the wiki.

• Oppose means the category will not be added.

• Neutral means you are either unsure or have no preference on the outcome of the vote.

Q&A

• What is a category? - A category is a link that is applied to similar pages and is visible on both the top and bottom of each page. An example of a category is Category:Items, which is found on all item pages. Upon clicking on the link, you will be able to see a list of all the pages that use that particular category.

• Why would we add this category? - Using this category would allow users to find a list of items that originally had another name before being renamed.

• What are examples of pages this category would be added to? - Examples include the Rare Glove, Rare Viking Hat, AJ Classic Game Console, and Longbow.

• How long would this take? - It may take a while to locate all of the items that have been renamed, but there should not be many items to begin with. Adding the category to those pages should not take up a significant amount of time.

How to Vote: Please clearly respond once with either support, oppose, or neutral and give a reason for your vote. Be mindful that you must have joined the wiki at least 14 days ago in order to vote, per our Voting Policy. This means that your first post or edit to this wiki must have been made that long ago.

For the discussion thread, see [Discussion] New Categories.

The Vote: Should the wiki add Category:Formerly_Unnamed_Items to article pages about items that formerly had no name?

• Support means the aforementioned category will be added to the appropriate articles on the wiki.

• Oppose means the category will not be added.

• Neutral means you are either unsure or have no preference on the outcome of the vote.

Q&A

• What is a category? - A category is a link that is applied to similar pages and is visible on both the top and bottom of each page. An example of a category is Category:Items, which is found on all item pages. Upon clicking on the link, you will be able to see a list of all the pages that use that particular category.

• Why would we add this category? - Using this category would allow users to find a list of items that previously did not have a name but were eventually updated to include the proper name.

• What are examples of pages this category would be added to? - Examples include the AJ Classic Game Console and Gingerbread Mask.

• How long would this take? - It would likely only take a couple of minutes to add the category to all applicable pages.

How to Vote: Please clearly respond once with either support, oppose, or neutral and give a reason for your vote. Be mindful that you must have joined the wiki at least 14 days ago in order to vote, per our Voting Policy. This means that your first post or edit to this wiki must have been made that long ago.

For the discussion thread, see [Discussion] Recycle Field on Den Infoboxes.

The vote: Should the wiki add a new "Recycle" field to the Den infobox to represent the den's recycle value?

• Support means there will be a "Recycle" indicator on the bottom row of the Den infobox.

• Oppose means the Den infobox will remain the way it is.

• Neutral means you are either unsure or have no preference on the outcome of the vote.

Q&A

• What is the Den infobox? The Den infobox is the table that can be found to the right side of all den pages.

• Why would we add a "Type" field? - Currently, the recycle value is not mentioned anywhere on den articles. Since each den on the game recycles for a different amount of Gems. people may be interested in knowing the exact recycle value for a given den. Creating a Recycle field on the den infobox would not only provide a place to add the recycle value, but it would also help make the information more visible.

• How are den recycle values calculated? - All dens recycle for 30% of their in-stores price. Dens sold in the Diamond Shop typically recycle for 3,000 gems, though there may be some exceptions.

• How long would this take? Given that there are only around 50 pages under the Dens category, this process should only take a couple of minutes at most.

How to Vote: Please clearly respond once with either support, oppose, or neutral and give a reason for your vote. Be mindful that you must have joined the wiki at least 14 days ago in order to vote, per our Voting Policy.

For the discussion thread, see [Discussion] Change Infobox Layout to Default Layout.

Due to a previous vote, some infoboxes on the wiki now use a smart layout. However, because there were some issues with the smart layout, this vote is being held to change the infobox layout to the default layout.

The Vote: Should the wiki change the infobox layout to the default layout?

• Support means the infoboxes on the wiki will be changed to the default layout, which places each corresponding field and value on one row.

• Oppose means all infoboxes will remain the same.

• Neutral means you are either unsure or have no preference on the outcome of the vote.

Q&A

• What is an infobox? An infobox is the table that can be found on the top right side of most pages.

• Why would we change the infobox layout? - The current smart layout causes incorrect/conflicting values to show up on Google Search, particularly with the Beta stage? field on item pages. In addition, the smart layout takes up far more vertical space on mobile devices than does the default layout. Because the default layout is more prevalent than the smart layout on Fandom wikis, the default layout is likely to be better optimized.

• What are the downsides? - The default layout takes up slightly more space than the smart layout on desktop, but the difference is not very significant and is not likely to be noticeable.

• How long would this take? The changes can be applied very quickly by modifying the infobox templates on the wiki.

• How would these changes look visually?

(dark mode view of the item infobox on FandomDesktop)

How to Vote: Please clearly respond once with either support, oppose, or neutral and give a reason for your vote. Be mindful that you must have joined the wiki at least 14 days ago in order to vote, per our Voting Policy.

From time to time, AJHQ will release a recolored version of an armor set or an updated version of a den item collection. Examples include:

• Clover Armor Set

• Friendship Armor Set

• Eclipse Outfit

• Rainbow Armor Set

• Ancient Armor Set

• Flower Armor Set

• Epic Plushies

The original versions and newer versions are either grouped into a single collection page (ex. Clover Armor Set) or they are split into separate collection pages (ex. Eclipse Outfit & Rare Eclipse Outfit).

Should we split apart the original items and newer items into separate collection pages? Or should we keep them them together on the same collection page?

I am in the process of splitting up the Wild Weekend page into individual sale pages. However, for certain Wild Weekends, I notice that the items in the collection are split up into two collection pages: one for the armor set and another for the den items.

1. How should we deal with Wild Weekend sales that are split up in two collection pages?

A. Leave them separate WITHOUT creating a new Wild Weekend page

B. Leave them separate AND create a new Wild Weekend page - Example: a "Fantastic Felines" page would be created that incorporates all the items in the "Fantastic Felines Collection" page and the "Ferocious Feline Set" page, but the latter two collection pages would still remain

C. Move the den item collection page to a page for the Wild Weekend sale and keep the armor set page separate - Example: the "Fantastic Felines Collection" page would be moved to the "Fantastic Felines" page, but the "Ferocious Feline Set" page would still remain

D. Merge the two collection pages together to form a new page for the Wild Weekend sale - Example: the "Fantastic Felines Collection" page and "Ferocious Feline Set" page would both redirect to the "Fantastic Felines" page, which incorporates items from both collections

E. Something else (please explain in your reply)

Something else to discuss: the items sold in the Summer Storms Wild Weekend are all already contained in the "Cloudburst Armor" page.

2. How should we deal with the "Cloudburst Armor" page?

A. Keep the page as it is

B. Rename the page to "Cloudburst Armor Set"

C. Rename the page to "Summer Storms" and modify information on the page to describe the sale more generally

D. Keep the page, but also create a separate "Summer Storms" page that incorporates all the items in the "Cloudburst Armor" page

E. A combination of options B and D

F. Something else (please explain in your reply)

SO i hadnt been on here in a long time and... the layout of the wiki is different.. help?

There was recently a vote to change the infobox layout from a stacked layout to a smart layout with two items per row. However, there are a number of issues with the smart layout that I believe it would be better to switch to the default layout.

For reference, the default layout looks like this on desktop:

The smart layout looks like this on desktop:

The smart layout takes up significantly more vertical space on mobile devices. As shown below, the Top Hat page, which has a smart layout, has much more vertical padding on the infobox than does the Arctic Wolf page, which has a default layout on mobile:

(Top Hat page)

(Arctic Wolf page)

In addition, the smart layout causes incorrect/conflicting values to show up on Google search:

(Google Search results for the Top Hat - notice the conflicting values for the Beta Stage? field)

Based on these factors, I think the default layout is a better alternative than the smart layout. The default layout is more commonly used on Fandom wikis and is likely to be better optimized by Fandom. Even though the smart layout takes up slightly less space than the default layout on desktop, the difference is not very significant.

Should we change the infobox layout to the default layout?

Should we add a "Recycle" field to the Den infobox? On den pages, the Den infobox does not have the "Recycle" field to indicate how much the den recycles for. Since every den recycles for a different value, I believe that such a field should be included on the Den infobox. It should not be too difficult to get the recycle values of each den since I can use the files to figure them out.

For the discussion thread, see [Discussion] Wild Weekend Page.

The vote has passed (100%) with 8 votes supporting (100%), 0 votes neutral (0%), and 0 votes opposed (0%).

The Wild Weekend page is currently the largest page on the wiki at 58,783 bytes, around 18,000 bytes larger than the second largest page (The Forgotten Desert). The page has a section for all of the 40+ Wild Weekend sales and lists all the items that were part of each sale. This is extremely redundant considering that there are already pages for many of the sales.

We would add Category:Wild_Weekend for collection pages about Wild Weekend sales. The category will help distinguish those pages from regular collections. However, the category will not be added to items that were sold as part of a Wild Weekend sale.

The Vote: Should the wiki add Category:Wild Weekend to all individual Wild Weekend pages?

• Support means the aforementioned category will be added to the appropriate articles on the wiki.

• Oppose means the category will not be added.

• Neutral means you are either unsure or have no preference on the outcome of the vote.

Q&A

• What is a category? - A category is a link that is applied to similar pages and is visible on both the top and bottom of each page. An example of a category is Category:Items, which is found on all item pages. Upon clicking on the link, you will be able to see a list of all the pages that use that particular category.

• Why would we add this category? - Using this category would allow users to find a list of all of the Wild Weekend pages in one place. This can be useful if a person were to try to locate the page for a particular Wild Weekend because the category would significantly narrow the search.

• How long would this take? - A bot would add the category to all of the necessary pages in a few minutes. This change would not require any manual changes.

How to Vote: Please clearly respond once with either support, oppose, or neutral and give a reason for your vote. Be mindful that you must have joined the wiki at least 14 days ago in order to vote, per our Voting Policy. This means that your first post or edit to this wiki must have been made that long ago.

For the previous discussion about adding new categories, see [Discussion] New Categories.

Here’s a couple new category ideas because why not:

Formerly Unnamed Items: This would be a category for any items that previously did not have a name, but their name was re-added at some point. (Example: AJ Classic Game Console)

Renamed Items: This would be a category for any items that had a name, but that name was changed to be something different (Example: also the AJ Classic Game Console)

Opinions Needed

1. Should we add a Formerly Unnamed Items category?

2. (If yes to #1) What should we name this category?

3. Should we add a Renamed Items category?

4. (If yes to #3) What should we name this category?

5. Any other category ideas?

These categories are mostly just for people browsing the wiki, so they shouldn’t be the highest priority to add to pages, but I figured since I had the idea I would create a discussion.

I was wondering whether we should have a Summer Sale category for all of the Diamond Shop items that are sold at a discount for the Summer Sale. The category would also apply to discounted items that were released after the Summer Sale started, in addition to discounted items that were removed before the Summer Sale ends.

With the category, the Summer Sale page could use a DPL table to automatically update itself every time an editor adds the Summer Sale category to a new item released at the Diamond Shop. Each item in the Summer Sale is sold for 50% off, rounded up if it is not a whole number. The DPL table could take the normal price of all of the items in the Summer Sale category and calculate their discount value.

Currently, the Summer Sale page has an item list that I can use to automatically add the Summer Sale category to the appropriate pages. The benefit of this approach is that editors would no longer need to edit the Summer Sale page every time a new item comes out on discount, so they can just focus on the item page itself. The downside is that the category would not have much use once the Summer Sale ends. The category may not be entirely necessary because editors can still manually update the Summer Sale page with newly added discounted items.

I would honestly be fine with either approach, whether we add the category or not. It would be great to hear opinions from everyone else about this.

On the wiki, the pages about party shops are kind of inconsistent and a bit difficult to navigate. I think what we should do is have a subsection for each item type. Then under each item type, we should have a bunch of tabs that show the shop over the years. This is at least better than having nested collapsibles, bullet points describing the shop history, or a long list of subheadings.

Example with the New Year's Shop page:

Should we change the format for party shop pages as outlined above?

For the voting threads, see [Discussion] Wild Weekend Page and [Discussion] Wild Weekend Category.

The Wild Weekend page is currently the largest page on the wiki at 58,783 bytes, around 18,000 bytes larger than the second largest page (The Forgotten Desert). The page has a section for all of the 40 or so Wild Weekend sales and lists all the items that were part of each sale. However, I think this is extremely redundant considering that there are already pages for many of the sales. The Wild Weekend page will become more condensed and easily navigable if the page simply linked to those sale pages rather than listing every single item from every single sale.

Another addition I would like to propose is to add Category:Wild_Weekend for collection pages about Wild Weekend sales. The category will help distinguish those pages from regular collections. However, the category will not be added to items that were sold as part of a Wild Weekend sale.

Questions for you:

1. Should we remove all the item tables on the Wild Weekend page and replace them with links to each Wild Weekend sale?

2. Should we add Category:Wild_Weekend to collection pages about Wild Weekend sales?

Recently I updated the Distinguish template to automatically add links to clothing items that share a similar shape. You can edit the data for all the clothing at Module:Distinguish/Data.

How it works

Each group in the table represents a unique clothing pattern and contains a list of item pages that have that pattern. Basically what the template does is it goes through all the groups in the table to find any groups that the item is located in. If the program does find a group, then it adds links to all the other pages in the group that have not already been added by the user.

Usage

Rather than editing multiple different pages every time a recolored clothing item comes out, it would be a lot easier to just add that clothing item to the appropriate group on the table and let the program handle the rest. However, keep in mind that you can still pass in text to the Distinguish template and it will still show up alongside the other links that the program added.

Examples

Page: Uncle Sam Hat

{{Distinguish|the [[Rare Custom Top Hat]] or [[Top Hat]]}}

Result: Not to be confused with the Classic Top Hat, Founders' Hat, Freedom Hat, Rare Friendship Hat, Rare Custom Top Hat or Top Hat.

Page: Candy Cane Tie

{{Distinguish}}

Result: Not to be confused with the Silver And Gold Tie.

Feedback

If something goes horribly wrong with the template code on one page, please feel free to tell me and I will try to deal with the issue. Otherwise, if you have any suggestions on how the template could be improved, your feedback would be very much appreciated.

Note: I haven't added den items to the data table yet just because it's a bit more difficult to automate. I might consider doing it in the future but I think that the Distinguish template isn't as important for den items. New clothing items on the game are guaranteed to share the same shape of an existing item whereas new den items tend to be unique.

For the discussion thread, see [Discussion] Split Rare/Special Variants Into Separate Pages

The vote has passed (91.67%) with 5 votes supporting (83.33%), 1 vote neutral (16.67%), and 0 votes opposed (0%).

Currently, the wiki considers certain items on the game to be variants of another item when they are technically separate items in the game files. This includes the following:

• Rare variants such as Rare Item Monday items - Example: The Top Hat page also contains info about the Rare Top Hat, Rare Jamaaliday Top Hat, Rare Spooky Top Hat, and Rare Custom Top Hat, but all four of these items are separate items from the Top Hat.

• Exclusive recolorations such as Wild Weekend recolorations - Example: The Rocker Jacket page includes info about the yellow Rocker Jacket that is sold separately from the rest of the Rocker Jackets, even though the yellow Rocker Jacket is its own separate item.

• Other examples - Despite sharing the same name, the long Spiked Collar and short Spiked Collar are not actually the same item but they are both placed on the same page anyway. The same thing can be said for long and short Spiked Wristbands as well as diamond and non-diamond Elf Tail Armors.

The Vote: Should we split up "special variants" that are technically separate items?

• Support means the wiki will create entirely new pages for the aforementioned special variants and remove information about those variants from the pages they are currently on.

• Oppose means that no changes will be made.

• Neutral means you are either unsure or have no preference on the outcome of the vote.

Q&A

• Why would we make these changes? - These changes are essentially to improve organization on the wiki and ensure that the categories do not conflict with each other. With the Rocker Jacket, the normal Rocker Jacket is unavailable but the Wild Weekend Rocker Jacket is available. The Rocker Jacket page currently has the Available category, but this could make it seem like the normal Rocker Jackets are available too. In addition, the wiki already has separate pages for items that share the same base (such as the Freedom Fox Hat and Rare Fox Hat), so splitting special variants should not be considered any more different than this.

• What are the downsides? - These changes may end up making it more difficult for readers to locate special variants if they are used to finding them alongside the normal variants. In addition, the changes would take a significant amount of time to finish.

• Will rare pets be separated? - Yes, pets with rare tags that are put in a page alongside another pet will be separated into their own page because the two pets are still technically separate pets.

• Will glitched variants be separated? - Glitched variants that were officially released but were discontinued (such as the magenta Furry Hat and "beta" Elf Helmet) will not be separated from the normal variants because they are not considered separate items. However, unreleased glitched variants (such as those from the Item Return) should be moved to the Unreleased Variants subpage. Glitched variants given out during AJHQ Live Streams will not be separated either.

• How long would this take? - Currently there are hundreds of pages that combine special variants alongside normal variants, so I would estimate that the change would take weeks to complete.

How to Vote: Please clearly respond once with either support, oppose, or neutral and give a reason for your vote. Be mindful that you must have joined the wiki at least 14 days ago in order to vote, per our Voting Policy. This means that your first post or edit to this wiki must have been made that long ago.

For the discussion thread, see [Discussion] Infobox Layout.

The vote has passed (100%) with 6 votes supporting (100%), 0 votes neutral (0%), and 0 votes opposed (0%).

In the discussion thread, 3/5 users expressed that they wanted to change the infobox layout to display two items per row.

The Vote: Should the wiki change the infobox layout to include a smart group with two items per row?

• Support means the infoboxes on the wiki will be changed to include a smart group with the row-items="2" attribute. If there are an odd number of items, one of the items will take up the entire width of the infobox.

• Oppose means all infoboxes will remain the same

• Neutral means you are either unsure or have no preference on the outcome of the vote.

Q&A

• What is an infobox? An infobox is the table that can be found on the top right side of most pages.

• Why would we change the infobox layout? - Currently, the infoboxes on the wiki use either the stacked or default layout, but these layouts only have one item per row. The stacked layout in particular can take up a significant amount of vertical space while leaving a lot of empty space among the rows. A smart group with two items per row would use the empty space much more efficiently, saving room on the page and reducing scroll time.

• What are the downsides? - Infobox items that take up a large amount of space may end up looking squished if two items are being placed in one row. It may also take time for readers to adjust to the new changes.

• How long would this take? The changes can be applied very quickly by modifying the infobox templates on the wiki.

• How would these changes look visually?

(dark mode view of the item infobox on FandomDesktop)

How to Vote: Please clearly respond once with either support, oppose, or neutral and give a reason for your vote. Be mindful that you must have joined the wiki at least 14 days ago in order to vote, per our Voting Policy.

For the discussion thread, see [Discussion] Unnamed Items Category

The vote has passed (100%) with 6 votes supporting (100%), 0 votes neutral (0%), and 0 votes opposed (0%).

The Vote: Should the wiki add Category:Unnamed_Items to article pages about items that have no name?

• Support means the aforementioned category will be added to the appropriate articles on the wiki.

• Oppose means the category will not be added.

• Neutral means you are either unsure or have no preference on the outcome of the vote.

Q&A

• What is a category? - A category is a link that is applied to similar pages and is visible on both the top and bottom of each page. An example of a category is Category:Items, which is found on all item pages. Upon clicking on the link, you will be able to see a list of all the pages that use that particular category.

• Why would we add this category? - Using this category would allow users to find a list of unnamed items all in one place. This can be useful if a person were to try to locate the page for a particular unnamed item because the category would significantly narrow the search.

• What are examples of pages this category would be added to? - Currently, there are four released items I can think of that have no name: Tire Swing, Violin, Lit Flamingo Topiary, and Rare Snow Hat. The category would also apply to unnamed unreleased items, such as yardGarden and the Clock.

• How long would this take? - It would likely only take a couple of minutes to add the category to all applicable pages.

How to Vote: Please clearly respond once with either support, oppose, or neutral and give a reason for your vote. Be mindful that you must have joined the wiki at least 14 days ago in order to vote, per our Voting Policy. This means that your first post or edit to this wiki must have been made that long ago.